Can one company see another company's information?

Company knowledge belongs to the company that owns and governs it. A second company does not gain access merely because the same human or Executive Partner works with both.

Personal truth also remains distinct from company-owned truth. Connection should not collapse those ownership boundaries.

Sometimes work legitimately crosses a boundary. A person might need to carry an approved fact from one role into another conversation, or explicitly coordinate work across organizations.

That should be a governed context movement tied to the task and authority, not a permanent merge of the underlying Brains.

Even if an Executive Partner can technically reach systems in two company environments, the applicable identity, scope, permissions, policy, and authority still determine what can be used for the task.

This is the same reason ELEV8 treats connection and authority as separate concepts everywhere else.

The person-owned Executive Partner can be portable. Company-owned durable truth is not automatically portable with the individual when a role changes or ends.

That distinction is part of keeping the Executive Partner personal without weakening company ownership.

A weak assistant sees very little. A capable Partner can eventually work across many systems and responsibilities.

The more useful the relationship becomes, the more important explicit scope boundaries become. Convenience cannot be allowed to turn into accidental data pooling.

One Executive Partner can follow a person across authorized worlds.

The worlds themselves stay separately owned and governed. Cross-scope context is something to authorize for a legitimate purpose, not something the architecture should assume.